Sometimes you can’t trust algorithms to understand the visual aspects of art … I just added the “Mondrian Squares Challenge Game” to the site, and when I added a promo to my art games page on Pinterest, it showed me a selection of “related pins,” some of which you can see below. The Pinterest algorithm is clearly basing its connection on the primary colors of red, blue and yellow, because these “related pins” have nothing else in common with Piet Mondrian and his paintings. As you can see, Pinterest wants to match up Mondrian with vending machines, a number of computer motherboards, international flags, and a Pac Mac video game. Those recommendations may not help one learn anything new about Mondrian, but it does provide a humorous collage of images.
Everyone has a favorite color, but it’s interesting to see what can happen when someone loves the color red. To be honest, I think living in a home with an all-red room would be overwhelming, but here’s a look at a few … clockwise, from top left: a photograph of Diana Vreeland’s living room; a Jeremiah Goodman drawing of Diana Vreeland’s living room; Henri Matisse’s famous painting “Harmony in Red (The Red Room),” 1908; and Henri Matisse’s painting “The Red Studio,” 1911.
Every once in a while as I’m reading the New York Times front page news, I’ll notice a photograph in an article that jumps out as more-artistic than most news photos. This past Sunday’s paper had a story about China upending the global economic order, and this picture grabbed my attention:
I like this image for the composition and interior light source; despite the view of three workers in a vast landscape with blue-ridged mountains in the background, the eye is immediately drawn to the intense light coming out of a large steel tube in which the foremost worker is welding. But even with the focus here, the eye can’t rest on just the welder – there’s an ambiguous machine to the left, spray paint can-sized debris (I’m not sure what they are) all over the ground in the lower right corner, and the beauty of the mountains and near-sunset light in the background – or is it sunrise? There’s a lot to look at here.
When I did a search to see what other news photographs Mr. Dean had taken, I found this gem … it’s a photo of a dock worker using a mallet to dislodge frozen tuna aboard a Chinese cargo vessel, which was included in a story that Dean photographed for National Geographic. It’s another example of an image where the light source sets the tone for the whole picture. I’d frame and hang this one on a wall, if I could.
Adam Dean is a freelance photographer who works primarily between Bangkok and Beijing, and he is represented by Panos Pictures, which is a photo agency specializing in global social issues. You can learn more about Adam Dean and see more of his work at his website here.
I recently happened upon the work of Eleanor Macnair, who has been re-creating famous photographs in Play-Doh for the past few years. Part of her drive in making these artworks is to make art historical images more accessible to the general public, and the use of Play-Doh helps demystify the art and make it feel more democratic. The artist says: “Even after working in the art and photography world I sometimes find it exclusive and inaccessible. I didn’t study fine art or go to art school and didn’t have the right background or initially the right connections … I wanted to do something that wasn’t pretentious, that everyone could enjoy.”
Here’s a sampling of the original source photographs and Macnair’s versions in Play-Doh, which she then photographs as well. You can see more of her work here.
Below left: “Frida on Bench” by Nickolas Muray; below right: “Frida on Bench” by Eleanor Macnair
If you’ve been a reader of this blog, you may know that I’m a fan of the artist Julian Schnabel. Despite his polarizing presence in the art world, I’ve always liked his work and his can-do-anything attitude. At any rate, there’s a new movie out about Schnabel titled Julian Schnabel: A Private Portrait which chronicles the personal life and public career of the artist. It was included in the 2017 Tribeca Film Festival and is currently showing only at the Lincoln Plaza Cinema in New York.
I heard about an interesting web project today: “Earth 2050,” which features detailed predictions by experts and futurologists for the years 2030, 2040, and 2050. It was developed by Kasperksy Lab, the global cybersecurity corporation, and allows people to create an account and add their own predictions and futuristic ideas.
I’ve just barely scratched the surface of what there is on the site, but wanted to share this wild (crazy?) prediction for New York City in the year 2050. The location is midtown Manhattan, specifically the southern edge of Grand Army Plaza at Central Park South, with a view of the Plaza Hotel on the right side. The top picture (below) shows this view of New York City right now, and below that is the exact same view in the year 2050 as envisioned by digital artist Akim Fimin. I love the sci-fi futuristic vision of Fimin, he’s an extremely talented artist, but this is calling for a pretty drastic architectural makeover for New York City. The Plaza Hotel remains fixed in time, a classic that endures “as-is” through the middle of the 21st Century … but check out the rest of midtown Manhattan! All of those other buildings are wiped out, replaced by futuristic architecture, and the (minimal) traffic is in the air, not on the street.
I don’t think midtown Manhattan is going to change this drastically in the next 33 years, but it’s still a fun website to visit and look around. It’s an interactive site, you can choose where you want to investigate throughout the world, and you can choose whether to visit 2030, 2040, or 2050 for most of the individual locations. There’s little green hexagons that you can click on to read more specific predictions for the future, there’s a futuristic soundtrack, and there’s all sorts of wild ideas in this site … check it out for yourself!
The NY Times had an interesting article this past weekend on the building of an Airbus A321 at a former military base in Mobile, Alabama. It wasn’t so much the article itself, but rather the photographs that grabbed my attention, because the images showed a beautiful side of plane-building that I’ve never seen before.
The photographer is Christopher Payne, who is represented by Bonni Benrubi Gallery in New York City. Payne specializes in architectural photography and the large format documentation of America’s industrial heritage. Trained as an architect, he is fascinated by design, assembly, and the built form. This isn’t the first time we’ve been smitten with Payne’s photographs – he also did a series of photographs of the Steinway piano factory in Astoria, Queens, which we wrote about a few months ago.
Above left: Looking inside the rear section of the fuselage, toward the aft of the plane. Above right: Each of the wings weighs 4.5 tons. Here, they are attached to the fuselage with approximately 1,200 rivets per side. Both photographs are by Christopher Payne for The New York Times.
I saw this graffiti mural in the Bronx which appears to be a portrait of Miles Davis with a somewhat crooked and bent trumpet, except the tag at the top right corner says “Styles Davis.” I’m not finding any reference to a graffiti artist who goes by that name, but I do see the lower right tags that reference “UPS” and “COD,” both of which appear to be graffiti crews that have work in the Bronx.
At any rate, I like the red-tinted sunglasses on the Miles Davis figure, and it prompted a memory of Miles wearing some pretty funky sunglasses over the years … scroll down below the graffiti mural to see a selection of Miles Davis sunglasses pictures.
Check out some of these sunglasses on Miles Davis! I realize that these pictures are primarily from the 1970s and 1980s, but still – those aren’t your typical sunglasses. I think I like the ones in the bottom right picture the best … where could I get some of those???
As I was walking along the High Line the other day, I passed the Church of the Guardian Angel, and noticed a banner depicting a guardian angel hanging from the side of the church. I didn’t realize until I got home and saw this photograph on my computer that it looks like the angel is hovering over the traffic on 10th Avenue and looking down on them. Even though the brass knob at the bottom of the banner gives it away, the color of the banner matches up nicely with the building across the street, which helps with the illusion of the hovering guardian angel.
If you’re someone with any sort of nostalgia for the graffiti-covered bathrooms of CBGB’s (below left), then you have a nice, clean modern version to utilize in your home: Peronda Group’s “Banksy Museum Design Collection” of graffiti tiles, seen below right. Hold on, though – this concept brings up a number of questions, which I have posted below the initial picture …
My first question is for Peronda: according to your Banksy graffiti tile page, these graffiti tiles are “inspired by street graffiti,” but none of them (that I can see) reference Banksy’s work, so why are they called the “Banksy Museum Design Collection?” Here’s another look at Peronda’s tiles, below left, and some examples of Banksy’s street art below right … see what I mean? No correlation whatsoever.
My 2nd question is: did Banksy sign off – or get paid – for having his name associated with this collection of graffiti tiles? I have no problem with Banksy wanting to make a little money off of his name, but I would think he’d take a look at these tiles and agree that they don’t really fit with his own style of graffiti.
My third question would be, if Banksy’s getting paid, but the graffiti tiles show just small details from other graffiti artists’ work, do any of those graffiti artists get paid? A close look at these tiles seem to show such tightly-cropped details that it’s probably pretty hard for anyone to lay claim to them (from the actual artist’s perspective). Or are they truly just “graffiti inspired” and some random artists in a Peronda design studio just made these details themselves?
If you have any thoughts on this, feel free to share in the comments section below.